Main Entry: bi·par·ti·san
Pronunciation: \(ˌ)bī-ˈpär-tə-zən, -sən, -ˌzan, chiefly British ˌbī-ˌpär-tə-ˈzan\
Function: adjective
Date: 1895
: of, relating to, or involving members of two parties ; specifically : marked by or involving cooperation, agreement, and compromise between two major political parties
-merriam-webster.com
In today’s day and age, political bipartisanship is (theoretically) the act of two opposing political parties working together, seeking compromises and making deals, in order to come to a conclusion that is mutually acceptable for all involved. For politicians, this is a method of progressing a thier political ambitions and philosophies in any way they can.
As a man firm in his convictions and well schooled on his philosophies, I have to ask: What the hell is so great about bipartisanship?
The very definition implies the maiming, or out right abandonment, of those ideals, morals, or philosophies that were originally supposed to be supported and upheld. I don’t want my elected official to get elected because they supported something and opposed something, and then go off to Washington to compromise and give ground on the very subjects they were elected to defend and push for. For example, if John J. Blowhard runs for senator and campaigns for denouncing big businesses and supporting the legalization of attaching lasers to beavers for military use, I don’t want him to get to Washington, engage in bipartisan negotiations with his opposition, and end up with a crack squad of beavers armed to their cute little buck teeth with the latest and greatest equipment from the fine company of NERF!
While Hasbro would undoubtedly love this, and icanhazcheeseburger.comwould probably open up a new page for their website, I would still consider this an abysmal failure in reaching the original goal he was elected to achieve. So, why is it that bipartisanship is so popular these days? We want our elected officials to compromise their beliefs and bend to political pressures to get a mutated version of victory and they can pat themselves on the back for a job well done? Bullshit. No one praises bipartisanship when everyone already agrees on a subject. They only hoist it on high as a plateau for political saints to stand upon when they weren’t able to get anything done without it. So, they deconstruct whatever bill it is that they’re working on so that they can build a new chimera for America to choke on and call it a glorious achievement for political unity and the beginning of a wondrous new era of life for everyone. And they’ll say things like this straight to our faces while that rotting corpse of a bill passes into law, diseasing the country with its incompetence and stupidity. All because they had to get something done, or people might begin to think they’re incompetent and incapable of achieving all the magical promises that they made to get elected in the first place. Well, yes, there is the pride factor, where everyone wants to be looked well upon by equals and praised by their lessers.
While I’m not a big fan by any means, I must admit that Michael Savage summed it all up right nicely. It is because the political party system in America has become a business, and it’s been like that for years. They have to get something done, or the people paying them to push their agendas will become angry with their gridlock and start paying other people to do a better job.
Yay capitalism?